Subscription pricing, monthly. One-off onboarding fee. A meetings guarantee sits underneath every engagement.
Under DIY, your team drives and we train. Under DFY, Hyper's managed-service team runs the platform end to end. Enterprise writes commercial terms to match multi-ICP, multi-market scope. All three sit on the same subscription shape: monthly, with a one-off onboarding fee and a meetings guarantee in contract.
Every engagement begins with an agreed qualified-meetings target for the first 90 days, written into the contract. Three outcomes are possible, and only three. The guarantee is a trust feature of the commercial model, not a sales mechanic.
Targets are written in the contract, not implied. They are calibrated per ICP, per tier and per market at onboarding. The guarantee runs through day 150 on every engagement, and applies identically to DFY, DIY and Enterprise.
Scope, operation, fit. Answered in the register of the argument above. If a question that matters to you is missing, the call is the fastest path.
No. Hyper integrates with the CRM you already run: Pipedrive, HubSpot, Salesforce, Dynamics. Research lands in the account record, outreach and replies file themselves against the right contact, coaching data attaches to the rep. We extend the CRM; we never replace it.
No. That is the point. The ten roles, SDR, research analyst, copywriter, web designer, sales coach, sales ops, marketing ops, BDR, pipeline analyst and RevOps manager, are all covered as software. Your reps take the meetings that land. You do not assemble the team; Hyper runs the team as software.
The platform is the same. Under DFY, Hyper's managed-service team runs the platform end to end: they manage the brief, the outreach, the follow-up, the recalibration; your team takes the meetings. Under DIY, your team runs the platform themselves as SaaS; we train your RevOps owner and stay available. DFY is the right default; DIY suits teams with a RevOps leader already in seat.
Under DFY: Hyper. A named lead drives the brief compilation, outreach cadence, reply triage and coaching rubric weekly, and reports into your leadership on the numbers. Under DIY: your team, led by a RevOps or marketing ops owner whom we train during onboarding and keep close through the engagement. In both modes, meetings land in your CRM under your reps.
Yes, as an opt-in module. AI outbound calling is enabled where industry and jurisdiction allow, and skipped where either does not fit. It is not suitable for every vertical. We enable it where it fits and skip it where it does not. The core offer, across DFY and DIY, is email, LinkedIn DM and landing pages; phone sits alongside these as a capability, per client.
It lands in your CRM, against the account record, as intelligence your own reps can use in conversations. Research is yours. The brief architecture that produces it is ours. You keep everything we generate; we keep the method of generating it.
Every sales call your reps run is scored against the six-dimension rubric: rapport, discovery, problem diagnosis, value articulation, objection handling, closing. Each rep sees their own scorecard, a keep/stop/start, a personalised development trajectory across quarters, and auto-filed action items from each call. Leadership sees the team view.
Two weeks from contract to first outbound under both delivery modes. Six weeks to a recalibrated brief architecture under DFY. Your time commitment during onboarding is roughly one hour per week, most of it in the first fortnight.
Supported in either direction, with 30 days' notice. The platform state, the brief architecture, the coaching history and the CRM integration all carry across. The move is a change in who runs the console; nothing underneath it changes.
Three months, billed monthly. Long enough to run the meetings guarantee through outcome 01 or into outcome 02. Long enough for the brief architecture to recalibrate once. No annual lock-in, no multi-year discount pressure.
· revenue engine